PCPulpit was designed to be a place where ideas can be shared and considered. Though it is my personal catharsis, I hope all of you will contribute as well.
The entire ID debate can be summed up in one sentence: The Darwinists are afraid of the evidence. This is why they must claim that ID theory is creationism with a new name and why they must silence the facts.
I"ll probably watch it, But I would imagine that it is not really going to support the Biblical account, of 7 literal days,
It will most likely be an "intelligent design" Theistic evolution approach, which espouses such nonsense as the "day/age theory that is prevalent among pseudo-christian/pseudo-scientist types who seem to try to play both sides of the field. And generally are disrespected among both.
But I could be wrong, I do look forward to seeing it, I just hope it promotes the truth and not compromise.
Ben Stein is a funny guy and I like listening to his input on economic matters. But I have to disagree with what he’s said on this matter. I tend to think Darwinists don’t lack evidence, but have the preponderance of it on their side. Furthermore, though I understand the desire to avoid twisting Scripture as Kurt speaks of, and agree that it’s wrong. I think, however, one can take a day/age, theistic evolutionary position without being a “pseudo-Christian” or doing injustice to the text.
The forum is gone, but there is still a way for you to leave comments about the posted articles. Here's how you do it:
-Scroll to the bottom of the post you would like to comment on and click "comments." -Type your comment in the box in the upper right hand corner of your screen. -Choose your identity. -Publish your comment.
**I recommend you select "Nickname" and then type your name rather than leave anonymous comments.
Want to recieve Email Updates?
Send an email request to pcpulpit@gmail.com.
About the Author
My name is Joshuah (PCPulpit Administrator). I decided to start PCPulpit because I was inspired by a sermon I heard entitled "Get Your Faith out of the church Building." I am the one who does all the posting and I will try my best to respond to all comments.
If there is ever a question or concern you would like to bring to my attention, please feel free to email me.
3 comments:
The entire ID debate can be summed up in one sentence: The Darwinists are afraid of the evidence. This is why they must claim that ID theory is creationism with a new name and why they must silence the facts.
I"ll probably watch it, But I would imagine that it is not really going to support the Biblical account, of 7 literal days,
It will most likely be an "intelligent design" Theistic evolution approach, which espouses such nonsense as the "day/age theory that is prevalent among pseudo-christian/pseudo-scientist types who seem to try to play both sides of the field. And generally are disrespected among both.
But I could be wrong, I do look forward to seeing it, I just hope it promotes the truth and not compromise.
Ben Stein is a funny guy and I like listening to his input on economic matters. But I have to disagree with what he’s said on this matter. I tend to think Darwinists don’t lack evidence, but have the preponderance of it on their side. Furthermore, though I understand the desire to avoid twisting Scripture as Kurt speaks of, and agree that it’s wrong. I think, however, one can take a day/age, theistic evolutionary position without being a “pseudo-Christian” or doing injustice to the text.
That's my two cents anyway.
Post a Comment